Corporate
In corporate law, June is traditionally the month of general meetings; therefore, we are presenting this June judgment 27 Cdo 306/2025 relevant to this topic. This time, we will focus on the rights of shareholders in a limited liability company when resolutions are passed at the general meeting.
H&P Corporate Law Judgment: Marginal defects of resolutions (January 2026)
We begin the new year where we left off at the end of the previous one. The above-mentioned decision was already cited in our previous Top Corporate Law Judgment update in the context of shareholder protests. This time, we return to it to address its second part, which deal with the concept of ‘marg
JOINT VENTURE | POINT ELEVEN | Control and access to information: The key to transparent corporate governance
How can control over a company and access to company information be ensured for shareholders? How can effective corporate control be implemented in a way that prevents the misuse of information while also avoiding potential conflicts?
H&P Corporate Judgment(s): End of 2025 | Protests
We are presenting selected judgments adopted at the end of 2025. This time, their number is greater, and their topics intertwine – they are all related to protests. A protest is a concept that is relatively new in the context of private and public companies, having been introduced by the Companies A
JOINT VENTURE |POINT TEN| The Principle of Loyalty: The Key to Harmonious Cooperation
What is the principle of loyalty and the non-compete obligation? Are they established by law, or do they require explicit regulation in a founding document or a shareholders’ agreement? And how can compliance with these principles be effectively ensured?
H&P corporate judgment: Concurrence of functions & unjust enrichment (October 2025)
In October, we return to the issue of so-called “concurrence of functions” (Case No. 27 Cdo 2155/2024). To start, let’s recall that concurrence of functions arises when a company’s statutory body member has also concluded an employment contract with the same company. Whether the activity carried ou
JOINT VENTURE | POINT NINE | Termination of a member’s or shareholder’s participation in a company
How can a member’s or shareholder’s participation in a company cease? What does the termination of participation entail? What rules should be set for termination?
H&P corporate case-law judgment: Review of reasons for non-payment of severance pay (September 2025)
In September, we are looking back at the “severance pay” for the director upon their removal from office, judgment case No. 27 Cdo 709/2025.
JOINT VENTURE | POINT EIGHT| Minority vs. majority: How to protect the rights of minority shareholders?
How to effectively protect the minority? What rights do minority shareholders have? How can they effectively assert these rights?
H&P Corporate Case Law: Attributability of good faith to a collective body (August 2025)
In our August briefing, we present a corporate case-law decision (Case No. 28 Cdo 945/2025) issued by a Supreme Court panel that is not specialised in corporate law. This time we shall guide you through attributability of knowledge and good faith to the collective body of a legal entity.
Authors




















