My dream of becoming a lawyer has been with me since childhood – back then I used to call it “being a big lawyer.” At university, I quickly discovered what practicing law really entails, and paradoxically, it only reassured me that this is exactly the field I want to pursue. I was drawn to corporate law through my studies at the faculty; this area fascinated me so much that I secretly hoped I would one day be able to focus on it fully. And it worked out – for several years now, I have been part of the corporate law team at HAVEL & PARTNERS, specializing primarily in corporate litigation.
nikola.cernikova@havelpartners.czArticles by the author
H&P corporate case-law judgment: A shareholder’s counter-proposal at the general meeting of a limited liability company (June 2026)
In corporate law, June is traditionally the month of general meetings; therefore, we are presenting this June judgment 27 Cdo 306/2025 relevant to this topic. This time, we will focus on the rights of shareholders in a limited liability company when resolutions are passed at the general meeting.
H&P corporate case-law judgment: The adverse aspect of the material publicity of the Commercial Register and the protection of third parties acting in good faith (May 2026)
In May, we are moving on from court proceedings to the principle of material publicity of the Commercial Register and the protection of third parties acting in good faith. In its judgment 27 Cdo 1812/2026, the Supreme Court addressed the so-called “adverse aspect” of material publicity, that is, the
H&P Corporate Law Judgment: Invalidity of a general meeting resolution due to a breach of the shareholders’ agreement (April 2026)
This April, we return once again to the topic of the invalidity of shareholders’ resolutions. In particular, we will look at whether a breach of a shareholders’ agreement may result in a shareholders’ resolution being declared invalid, including in light of the recent decision in case No. 27 Cdo 239
H&P Corporate Law Judgment: Shareholder’s capacity to sue for the provision of explanation (March 2026)
Our March edition takes a closer look at another type of corporate litigation. This time, we focus on the Czech Supreme Court Decision in Case No. 27 Cdo 1782/2025 and the conditions under which a shareholder may bring an action for the provision of explanation and the role played by supervisory boa
H&P Corporate Law Judgment: Amending grounds for invalidity of shareholders’ meeting resolutions after the deadline (February 2026)
In February, we continue our series of decisions concerning the invalidity of shareholders’ meeting resolutions. This time, we focus on decision No. 27 Cdo 3205/2024 and the question of until when it is possible to supplement or amend the grounds on which the invalidity of a shareholders’ meeting re